Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects

2018
Authors
Kašić, Vladan
Mihajlović, Slavica

Životić, Dragana

Simić, Vladimir

Stojanović, Jovica

Sekulić, Živko
Kragović, Milan

Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study presents investigations of zeolitic tuff samples from the “Igroš--Vidojevići” deposit. The aim of the research was to determine the quality of samples taken from all deposit parts. Thus, samples were taken from the footwall (“Zeolit 1”), and four samples from the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2”, “Zeolit 3”, “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5”). Characterization of the samples included chemical analysis, determination of the adsorption coefficient for methylene blue dye and cation-exchange capacity (CEC), X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRPD), differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA and TGA), and Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopic analysis (FTIR). Results have shown that the footwall consists mostly of clays, whereas zeolite minerals dominate in the rest of the deposit. XRD analysis of the “Zeolit 1” sample confirmed presence of smectite and kaolinite clays, while zeolite of analcime type and quartz are present as smaller fractions. Chemical composition analy...sis and determination of heavy metal contents showed a significant amount (7.58%) of Fe2 O3 in this sample. Therefore, further research can be pursued to find a method for removal of magnetic impurities in this deposit portion in order to utilize the clay fraction. On the other hand, according to XRD, FTIR, DTA/TGA and SEM/EDS analyses, samples which belong to the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2–5”) consist of clinoptilolite zeolite type, while clays are present in less than 10%. Thus, clays (smectites and kaolinite) accompanied with analcime and quartz are the most abundant footwall minerals while central deposit parts contain predominantly clinoptilolite accompanied with small amounts of clays. Mineragenetically, zeolites are most abundant in the “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” samples. The smallest value of CEC was determined for the “Zeolit 1” sample (46.98 mmol/100g). According to CEC values determined for “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” (141.99 and 121.01 mmol/100 g, respect-ively) these samples are of the best quality, and could be utilized as adsorbents of inorganic pollutants from contaminated waters. Moreover, they could be potentially used for removal of mycotoxins from cattle feed. “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5” samples have shown slightly lower CEC values (89.48 and 83.75 mmol/100 g, respectively), which implies lower quality, and, therefore, could be used for soil quality improvement. Finally, determination of the external CEC has revealed a significant difference between “Zeolit 1” and “Zeolit 5” samples (17.9 and 5.31 mmol/100 g, respectively).
Keywords:
Zeolite / X-Ray powder diffraction analysis / Thermal analysis / Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopic analysis / Footwall / Cation-exchange capacitySource:
Hemijska industrija, 2018, 72, 1, 29-37Publisher:
- Savez hemijskih inženjera, Beograd
Funding / projects:
- Development of technological processes for obtaining of ecological materials based on nonmetallic minerals (RS-34013)
- Implementation of new technical, technological and environmental solutions in the mining and metallurgical operations RBB and RBM (RS-33007)
DOI: 10.2298/HEMIND170428015K
ISSN: 0367-598X
WoS: 000429312400004
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85043782558
Collections
Institution/Community
Institut za tehnologiju nuklearnih i drugih mineralnih sirovinaTY - JOUR AU - Kašić, Vladan AU - Mihajlović, Slavica AU - Životić, Dragana AU - Simić, Vladimir AU - Stojanović, Jovica AU - Sekulić, Živko AU - Kragović, Milan PY - 2018 UR - https://ritnms.itnms.ac.rs/handle/123456789/464 AB - This study presents investigations of zeolitic tuff samples from the “Igroš--Vidojevići” deposit. The aim of the research was to determine the quality of samples taken from all deposit parts. Thus, samples were taken from the footwall (“Zeolit 1”), and four samples from the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2”, “Zeolit 3”, “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5”). Characterization of the samples included chemical analysis, determination of the adsorption coefficient for methylene blue dye and cation-exchange capacity (CEC), X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRPD), differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA and TGA), and Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopic analysis (FTIR). Results have shown that the footwall consists mostly of clays, whereas zeolite minerals dominate in the rest of the deposit. XRD analysis of the “Zeolit 1” sample confirmed presence of smectite and kaolinite clays, while zeolite of analcime type and quartz are present as smaller fractions. Chemical composition analysis and determination of heavy metal contents showed a significant amount (7.58%) of Fe2 O3 in this sample. Therefore, further research can be pursued to find a method for removal of magnetic impurities in this deposit portion in order to utilize the clay fraction. On the other hand, according to XRD, FTIR, DTA/TGA and SEM/EDS analyses, samples which belong to the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2–5”) consist of clinoptilolite zeolite type, while clays are present in less than 10%. Thus, clays (smectites and kaolinite) accompanied with analcime and quartz are the most abundant footwall minerals while central deposit parts contain predominantly clinoptilolite accompanied with small amounts of clays. Mineragenetically, zeolites are most abundant in the “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” samples. The smallest value of CEC was determined for the “Zeolit 1” sample (46.98 mmol/100g). According to CEC values determined for “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” (141.99 and 121.01 mmol/100 g, respect-ively) these samples are of the best quality, and could be utilized as adsorbents of inorganic pollutants from contaminated waters. Moreover, they could be potentially used for removal of mycotoxins from cattle feed. “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5” samples have shown slightly lower CEC values (89.48 and 83.75 mmol/100 g, respectively), which implies lower quality, and, therefore, could be used for soil quality improvement. Finally, determination of the external CEC has revealed a significant difference between “Zeolit 1” and “Zeolit 5” samples (17.9 and 5.31 mmol/100 g, respectively). PB - Savez hemijskih inženjera, Beograd T2 - Hemijska industrija T1 - Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects EP - 37 IS - 1 SP - 29 VL - 72 DO - 10.2298/HEMIND170428015K UR - conv_1030 ER -
@article{ author = "Kašić, Vladan and Mihajlović, Slavica and Životić, Dragana and Simić, Vladimir and Stojanović, Jovica and Sekulić, Živko and Kragović, Milan", year = "2018", abstract = "This study presents investigations of zeolitic tuff samples from the “Igroš--Vidojevići” deposit. The aim of the research was to determine the quality of samples taken from all deposit parts. Thus, samples were taken from the footwall (“Zeolit 1”), and four samples from the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2”, “Zeolit 3”, “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5”). Characterization of the samples included chemical analysis, determination of the adsorption coefficient for methylene blue dye and cation-exchange capacity (CEC), X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRPD), differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA and TGA), and Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopic analysis (FTIR). Results have shown that the footwall consists mostly of clays, whereas zeolite minerals dominate in the rest of the deposit. XRD analysis of the “Zeolit 1” sample confirmed presence of smectite and kaolinite clays, while zeolite of analcime type and quartz are present as smaller fractions. Chemical composition analysis and determination of heavy metal contents showed a significant amount (7.58%) of Fe2 O3 in this sample. Therefore, further research can be pursued to find a method for removal of magnetic impurities in this deposit portion in order to utilize the clay fraction. On the other hand, according to XRD, FTIR, DTA/TGA and SEM/EDS analyses, samples which belong to the central deposit part (“Zeolit 2–5”) consist of clinoptilolite zeolite type, while clays are present in less than 10%. Thus, clays (smectites and kaolinite) accompanied with analcime and quartz are the most abundant footwall minerals while central deposit parts contain predominantly clinoptilolite accompanied with small amounts of clays. Mineragenetically, zeolites are most abundant in the “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” samples. The smallest value of CEC was determined for the “Zeolit 1” sample (46.98 mmol/100g). According to CEC values determined for “Zeolit 2” and “Zeolit 3” (141.99 and 121.01 mmol/100 g, respect-ively) these samples are of the best quality, and could be utilized as adsorbents of inorganic pollutants from contaminated waters. Moreover, they could be potentially used for removal of mycotoxins from cattle feed. “Zeolit 4” and “Zeolit 5” samples have shown slightly lower CEC values (89.48 and 83.75 mmol/100 g, respectively), which implies lower quality, and, therefore, could be used for soil quality improvement. Finally, determination of the external CEC has revealed a significant difference between “Zeolit 1” and “Zeolit 5” samples (17.9 and 5.31 mmol/100 g, respectively).", publisher = "Savez hemijskih inženjera, Beograd", journal = "Hemijska industrija", title = "Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects", pages = "37-29", number = "1", volume = "72", doi = "10.2298/HEMIND170428015K", url = "conv_1030" }
Kašić, V., Mihajlović, S., Životić, D., Simić, V., Stojanović, J., Sekulić, Ž.,& Kragović, M.. (2018). Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects. in Hemijska industrija Savez hemijskih inženjera, Beograd., 72(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND170428015K conv_1030
Kašić V, Mihajlović S, Životić D, Simić V, Stojanović J, Sekulić Ž, Kragović M. Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects. in Hemijska industrija. 2018;72(1):29-37. doi:10.2298/HEMIND170428015K conv_1030 .
Kašić, Vladan, Mihajlović, Slavica, Životić, Dragana, Simić, Vladimir, Stojanović, Jovica, Sekulić, Živko, Kragović, Milan, "Characterization of the zeolitic tuff from the “igroš-vidojevići” deposit regarding geological and technological aspects" in Hemijska industrija, 72, no. 1 (2018):29-37, https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND170428015K ., conv_1030 .