Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorPopović, Vladimir
dc.creatorMikavica, Ivana
dc.creatorRanđelović, Dragana
dc.creatorMutić, Jelena
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T07:14:15Z
dc.date.available2023-10-18T07:14:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-84231-50-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://ritnms.itnms.ac.rs/handle/123456789/921
dc.description.abstractMicroplastic particles (MPs) emergence and expansion have occurred rapidly and almost imperceptibly on a worldwide basis. Its presence and persistence in terrestrial environments recently started attracting considerable attention from scientific researchers, policymakers, the media, and the general public. Several methods were developed in order to isolate MPs from complex soil samples. Density separation demonstrated to be the most efficient and cost-effective to date It consists of the following steps: soil sieving, grinding and measuring, MPs extraction using the saturated salt solution of the appropriate density higher than the MPs that need to be isolated, supernatant filtration, and visualization of MPs adhered to filter. Several approaches could be applied to soil MPs separations, considering the utilization of different extracting solutions, working conditions, and phases order, which we investigated herein. As soil samples contained around 5% of organic matter (OM), the first protocol implied organic matter digestion using 30% H2O2 before the extraction, while the second one was performed vice versa. In both protocols, the extraction solvent that was used was saturated NaCl solution, density 1.2 g cm-1. According to the obtained results, and bearing in mind the fact that MPs could be entrapped in soil aggregates, OM digestion before the extraction was considered suitable to continue the investigation. In the following protocol, digestion was conducted at different temperatures and durations of 7 days at 25˚C (room temperature) and 24h at 60˚C, respectively, which enabled more efficient OM removal. The temperature and time of exposure may need additional tuning according to the soil type. While using NaCl solution, only polymers with a density lower than 1.2 g cm-1 could be extracted, so in the next procedure, it was replaced by a saturated solution of ZnCl2, which density could go up to 1.9 g cm-1. Hence, the final protocol based on the previous optimization involved digestion with H2O2 at 60˚C for 24h, followed by covering the dry residue with saturated ZnCl2 solution. The mixture was left overnight for density separation. The upper layer of the solvent where the MPs tend to concentrate was taken by a glass dropper and filtered through a Whatman glass filter (pore size 1.6 μm, diameter 25 mm). Achieved efficiency regarding OM reduction rate and MPs extraction on examined soils was satisfactory for further investigations.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200023/RS//sr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200168/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceYoung Researches Conference 2022, YOURS 2022sr
dc.subjectmicroplasticsr
dc.subjectsoilssr
dc.subjectextractionsr
dc.subjectorganic mattersr
dc.subjectdensitysr
dc.titleDifferent approaches to microplastic extraction from soilssr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.citation.epage10
dc.citation.spage10
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://ritnms.itnms.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1936/bitstream_1936.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу